How open science helps researchers succeed release xsojhmbd6rbtdoheuhim73b33a

by Erin C McKiernan, Philip E Bourne, C Titus Brown, Stuart Buck, Amye Kenall, Jennifer Lin, Damon McDougall, Brian A Nosek, Karthik Ram, Courtney K Soderberg, Jeffrey R Spies, Kaitlin Thaney (+3 others)

Published in eLife by eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
ISSN-L 2050-084X
Release Date 2016-07-07
Publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Primary Language en (lookup)
All Contributors (15)
1
author
2
author
3
author
4
author
5
author
6
author
7
author
8
author
9
author
10
author
11
author
12
author
13
author
14
author
15
author

Abstract

<jats:p>Open access, open data, open source and other open scholarship practices are growing in popularity and necessity. However, widespread adoption of these practices has not yet been achieved. One reason is that researchers are uncertain about how sharing their work will affect their careers. We review literature demonstrating that open research is associated with increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities and funding opportunities. These findings are evidence that open research practices bring significant benefits to researchers relative to more traditional closed practices.</jats:p>
In application/xml+jats format

Extra Metadata (raw JSON)

crossref.subject ['General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology', 'General Immunology and Microbiology', 'General Neuroscience', 'General Medicine']
crossref.license [{'delay-in-days': 0, 'content-version': 'vor', 'URL': 'http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/', 'start': '2016-07-07T00:00:00Z'}]
crossref.funder [{'award': ['R24AG048124'], 'doi-asserted-by': 'publisher', 'name': 'National Institute on Aging', 'DOI': '10.13039/100000049'}, {'award': [], 'doi-asserted-by': 'crossref', 'name': 'Laura and John Arnold Foundation', 'DOI': '10.13039/100009827'}, {'award': ['46545'], 'doi-asserted-by': 'publisher', 'name': 'John Templeton Foundation', 'DOI': '10.13039/100000925'}]
crossref.type journal-article
crossref.alternative-id ['10.7554/eLife.16800']
crossref.archive ['CLOCKSS']

Known Files and URLs

application/pdf  13.3 MB
sha1:243b2fede7a128e90eb5...
digitalcommons.unl.edu (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
application/pdf  1.2 MB
sha1:320d78fd3ac897ff1c9c...
web.archive.org (webarchive)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
cdn.elifesciences.org (publisher)
application/pdf  12.6 MB
sha1:4511f369f99e4b222329...
cdn.elifesciences.org (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)

References

This release citing other releases
  1. Attention! A study of open access vs non-open access articles Figshare.2014 (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1213690)
  2. All trials registered, all results reported 2016
  3. San Francisco declaration on research assessment 2013
  4. Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries.2004372 (DOI: 10.5860/crl.65.5.372)
  5. Opinions on preprints in biology 2016
  6. Pre-registration made easy 2016
  7. Will open access get me cited? an analysis of the efficacy of open access publishing in political science Political Science & Politics.2015129 (DOI: 10.1017/s1049096514001668)
  8. Preprints for the life sciences Science.2016899 (DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf9133)
  9. Open Access Policy 2015
  10. A catalogue of data preservation, management and sharing policies from international funding agencies, regulators and journals 2016
  11. The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.20121496 (DOI: 10.1002/asi.22709)
  12. Anatomy of green open access Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2014237 (DOI: 10.1002/asi.22963)
  13. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact BMC Medicine.201273 (DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73)
  14. Who's afraid of peer review? Science.201360 (DOI: 10.1126/science.342.6154.60)
  15. Lax reviewing practice prompts 60 retractions at SAGE journal. Science Insider, 2014 2014
  16. Knowledge infrastructures in science: data, diversity, and digital libraries International Journal on Digital Libraries.2015207 (DOI: 10.1007/s00799-015-0157-z)
  17. A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: a multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants PLoS One.2010e14331 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014331)
  18. Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2013291 (DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291)
  19. Loose end Current Biology.1995568 (DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00109-x)
  20. The E-volution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.2001187 (DOI: 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::aid-asi1586>3.0.co;2-d)
  21. A reference-free algorithm for computational normalization of shotgun sequencing data 2012arXiv:1203.4802
  22. The 1,000,000 Preregistration Challenge 2016
  23. Open Access Policy for CERN Physics Publications 2014
  24. Budapest Open Access Initiative 2002
  25. The data paper: a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science BMC Bioinformatics.2011S2 (DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-s15-s2)
  26. Cofactor Journal Selector Tool 2016
  27. Tracking switched outcomes in clinical trials 2016
  28. Adam Curry v. Audax Publishing 2006
  29. Cites & Insights Books.2016.
  30. About The Licenses 2016
  31. What lies beneath?: Knowledge infrastructures in the subseafloor biosphere and beyond International Journal on Digital Libraries.201561 (DOI: 10.1007/s00799-015-0137-3)
  32. Joint declaration of data citation principles 2014
  33. Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? Scientometrics.2007203 (DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1661-8)
  34. Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial BMJ 337.2008a568 (DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a568)
  35. Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing FASEB Journal.20112129 (DOI: 10.1096/fj.11-183988)
  36. The case for open preprints in biology PLOS Biology.2013e1001563 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001563)
  37. The open access advantage for American law reviews Edison: Law + Technology.2015
  38. The data sharing advantage in astrophysics 2015arXiv: 1511.02512
  39. No-fee open access journals for all fields 2016
  40. Citation advantage of open access articles PLoS Biology.2006e157 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157)
  41. The effects of open access on un-published documents: a case study of economics working papers Journal of Informetrics.2009124 (DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2008.12.002)
  42. The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system: three science fields Information Processing & Management.2009131 (DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2008.06.001)
  43. Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research PLoS One.2010e13636 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013636)
  44. Creative Commons licenses upheld in Dutch court 2006
  45. Spanish Court Recognizes CC-Music 2006
  46. Getting cited: Does open access help? Research Policy.20111332 (DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.025)
  47. Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics Scientometrics.2010345 (DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0111-1)
  48. Posting your data: will you be scooped or will you be famous? International Studies Perspectives.200389 (DOI: 10.1111/1528-3577.04105)
  49. Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python Zenodo.2016 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.50186)
  50. Making data sharing count: a publication-based solution Frontiers in Neuroscience.2013 (DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00009)
  51. A practical guide for improving transparency and reproducibility in neuroimaging research bioRxiv.2016 (DOI: 10.1101/039354)
  52. The impact factors of open access and subscription journals across fields Current Science.2014380
  53. ORCID: a system to uniquely identify researchers Learned Publishing.2012259 (DOI: 10.1087/20120404)
  54. Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact 2006arXiv: cc/0606079
  55. Comparing the impact of open access (oa) vs. non-oa articles in the same journals D-Lib Magazine.2004
  56. Harvard's School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Recommends Open-Access Deposit for Faculty Review Process 2014
  57. Open access policies 2016
  58. Good practices for university open-access policies 2016
  59. From toddler to teen: growth of an open data ecosystem eJournal of eDemocracy & Open Government.2014123 (DOI: 10.29379/jedem.v6i2.330)
  60. Linking to data-effect on citation rates in astronomy 2011arXiv: 1111.3618
  61. The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies 2016
  62. Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research 2013
  63. The case for open computer programs Nature.2012485 (DOI: 10.1038/nature10836)
  64. IUPUI Promotion & Tenure Guidelines 2016
  65. Science magazine's open access sting. SPARC blog, 2013 2013
  66. Retraction notice Journal of Vibration and Control.20141601 (DOI: 10.1177/1077546314541924)
  67. Sociedad General de Autores y Editores v. Ricardo Andres Utrera Fernández 2006
  68. Likelihood of Null Effects of Large NHLBI Clinical Trials Has Increased over Time PLoS One.2015e0132382 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132382)
  69. Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency PLOS Biology.2016e1002456 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456)
  70. Diffusion of news about research Science Communication.2003 (DOI: 10.1177/1075547003255297)
  71. Investigating Variation in Replicability Social Psychology.2014142 (DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000178)
  72. Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering Scientometrics.20141033 (DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1101-x)
  73. The citation impact of open access agricultural research Online Information Review.2010772 (DOI: 10.1108/14684521011084618)
  74. A comparison of the quality of reviewer reports from author-suggested reviewers and editor-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or closed peer review models F1000 Posters.20131252
  75. Scientific Data.2015. (DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2015.39)
  76. Does open access in ophthalmology affect how articles are subsequently cited in research? Ophthalmology.20091425 (DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.052)
  77. arXiv E-prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.20141157 (DOI: 10.1002/asi.23044)
  78. Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact Nature.2001521 (DOI: 10.1038/35079151)
  79. APC data for 27 UK higher education institutions in 2015 Figshare.2016 (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1507481.v4)
  80. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license enforced in Germany. Creative Commons Blog, 2011 2011
  81. Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals Economic Inquiry.20141284 (DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12064)
  82. Does online availability increase citations? Theory and evidence from a panel of economics and business journals Review of Economics and Statistics.2015144 (DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00437)
  83. The citation impact of digital preprint archives for solar physics papers Solar Physics.2006549 (DOI: 10.1007/s11207-006-0262-7)
  84. Ecological data sharing Ecological Informatics.201533 (DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.06.010)
  85. MIT Faculty Open Access Policy 2016
  86. Panton Principles, Principles for open data in science 2010
  87. NIH Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance 2003
  88. Upcoming Changes to Public Access Policy Reporting Requirements and Related NIH Efforts to Enhance Compliance 2012
  89. Digital Research Data Sharing and Management 2011
  90. Author Insights 2015 Survey Figshare.2015 (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1425362.v7)
  91. Open Science 2016
  92. Impact factors: uses and abuses European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2002209 (DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200203000-00001)
  93. The citation advantage of open-access articles Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.20081963 (DOI: 10.1002/asi.20898)
  94. The Open Definition 2005
  95. 2016.Open Research Badges. 2016. http://openresearchbadges.org/.
  96. An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science Perspectives on Psychological Science.2012657 (DOI: 10.1177/1745691612462588)
  97. Implementing Reproducible Research.2014.
  98. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science Science.2015aac4716 (DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716)
  99. The Open Source Definition 2007
  100. Retraction Watch: Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process 2016
  101. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python Journal of Machine Learning Research.20112825
  102. Who's Afraid of Open Peer Review? PeerJblog, 2014 2014
  103. Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scientific community New England Journal of Medicine.19911180 (DOI: 10.1056/nejm199110173251620)
  104. The enduring value of social science research: the use and reuse of primary research data 2010
  105. Data reuse and the open data citation advantage PeerJ.2013e175 (DOI: 10.7717/peerj.175)
  106. The impact factor game PLOS Medicine.2006e291 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291)
  107. Data sharing in neuroimaging research Frontiers in Neuroinformatics.2012 (DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2012.00009)
  108. Open Access Funds 2016
  109. Get credit for peer review 2016
  110. OASPA's response to the recent article in Science entitled "Who's Afraid of Peer Review?". Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, 2013 2013
  111. Nature Communications: Citation analysis 2014
  112. Revised Policy on Enhancing Public Access to Archived Publications Resulting from NIH-Funded Research. National Institutes of Health, Office of Extramural Research, Extramural Nexus 2012
  113. Effect of open access on citation rates for a small biomedical journal 2005
  114. Demographic and citation trends in astrophysical journal papers and preprints 2004ArXiv: astro-ph/0411275
  115. Changing hiring practices towards research transparency: The first open science statement in a professorship advertisement 2016
  116. Scholar's Copyright Addendum Engine 2016
  117. Data sharing effect on article citation rate in paleoceanography. Presented at Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, 2011 2011
  118. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research BMJ.1997497 (DOI: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497)
  119. Practices in source code sharing in astrophysics Astronomy and Computing.201354 (DOI: 10.1016/j.ascom.2013.04.001)
  120. Publisher copyright policies and self-archiving 2016
  121. Research funders' open access policies 2016
  122. A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals PeerJ.2014e365 (DOI: 10.7717/peerj.365)
  123. Author Rights & the SPARC Author Addendum 2016
  124. The Open Access Citation Advantage Service 2016
  125. Springer statement on SCIgen-generated papers in conference proceedings 2014
  126. Toward Reproducible Computational Research: An Empirical Analysis of Data and Code Policy Adoption by Journals PLoS One.2013e67111 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067111)
  127. Trust your science? Open your data and code Amstat News.201121
  128. The taxpayer argument for open access. SPARC Open Access Newsletter 2003
  129. Open Access.2012.
  130. Open access policy: Numbers, analysis, effectiveness 2015arXiv:1504.02261
  131. The Open Access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. eprints, 2010 2010
  132. Open Access Policy concerning UNESCO publications 2013
  133. Open Access at the ULg. Open Repository and Bibliography 2016
  134. Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers Nature.2014 (DOI: 10.1038/nature.2014.14763)
  135. Funders punish open-access dodgers Nature.2014161 (DOI: 10.1038/508161a)
  136. Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial BMJ.2010c5729 (DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c5729)
  137. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial BMJ.199923 (DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23)
  138. Code sharing is associated with research impact in image processing Computing in Science & Engineering.201242 (DOI: 10.1109/mcse.2012.63)
  139. VCU Faculty Senate Resolution on Open Access Publishing 2010
  140. Open access citation advantage: An annotated bibliography Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.2010 (DOI: 10.5062/f4q81b0w)
  141. Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial The British Journal of Psychiatry.200047 (DOI: 10.1192/bjp.176.1.47)
  142. The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention Scientometrics.2015555 (DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0)
  143. Wellcome Trust strengthens its open access policy 2012
  144. Expert Advisory Group on Data Access 2016
  145. Position statement in support of open and unrestricted access to published research 2016
  146. Wellcome Trust and COAF Open Access Spend, 2014-15 2016
  147. Cost effectiveness of open access publications Economic Inquiry.20141315 (DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12117)
  148. A table summarizing the Federal public access policies resulting from the US Office of Science and Technology Policy memorandum of February 2013 Figshare.2015 (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1372041)
  149. Peer review quality and transparency of the peer-review process in open access and subscription journals PLoS One.2016e0147913 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147913)
  150. List of academic journals by preprint policy 2016
  151. The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship.2006.
  152. The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management.2015. (DOI: 10.13140/rg.2.1.4929.1363)
  153. Do open access articles in economics have a citation advantage? Munich Personal RePEc Archive.2014
  154. Self‐selection and the citation advantage of open access articles Online Information Review.201240 (DOI: 10.1108/14684521211206953)
  155. Analysis on open access citation advantage: an empirical study based on oxford open journals 2011426
  156. The growing impact of open access distance education journals: a bibliometric analysis International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education.2010
  157. The effect of open access on citation impact: A comparison study based on web citation analysis Libri.2006145 (DOI: 10.1515/libr.2006.145)
Download Full Text
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2016-07-07
DOI  10.7554/elife.16800
PubMed  27387362
PMC  PMC4973366
Wikidata  Q27313486
Container Metadata
Open Access Publication
In DOAJ
In ISSN ROAD
ISSN-L:  2050-084X
Fatcat Entry
Work Entity
grouping other versions (eg, pre-print) and variants of this release
Cite This Release
Fatcat Bits

State is "active". Revision:
21fcaed8-770b-4cdb-ac62-1428624302e4
As JSON object via API