Implementing National Disability Service Standards: What Street Level Bureaucrats Exercise Discretion for in the Provision of Employment Services release_x4zefmfaw5cxvnqtdqofaaet2a

by James Constantine Hondros, University, My, Elizabeth Van Acker

Entity Metadata (schema)

abstracts[] {'sha1': 'daca452acb86a9fc11088404901c9d1b33cfff3d', 'content': "The purpose of this thesis is to interpret the use of discretion to deliver public service in public interest. The research question to guide this purpose is, what do street-level bureaucrats use discretion for to implement disability service standards in Australia? Lipsky (1976) proposed that given their discretionary power, people on the front-line representing government (termed 'street-level bureaucrats') through daily people processing action on the front-line significantly affect policy outcomes. To implement social policy, a qualitative based method has been used to emphasize both intended and unintended consequences to front-line discretion. As a case, the street-level bureaucrats in disability employment services participated in semi-structured interviews and assisted this thesis design and provide the grounds to interpreting what it means to implement social policy in public interest today. By asking the question what is discretion used for, it is with the intention to uncover the meaning of public benefit, deep-rooted in service delivery. It is argued a street-level bureaucrat determines the meaning for citizen-consumer experience from standards in the legislation, and in so doing this, will highlight the ambiguity experienced in service delivery between state-agent or citizen-agent understanding surrounding 'public interest' and 'public service'. The foundation on which the nature, amount and quality of benefits and sanctions, to assist people with a disability into sustainable employment, still rests with new street-level bureaucrats rather than the state initiative. Outcomes of service delivery rest on, in part, the use of discretion by street-level bureaucrats. This thesis disagrees with the state-agent ideal whereby particular outcomes that are unintended or unanticipated by those responsible for setting policy objectives (government) can be explained by the discretion of street-level bureaucrats.", 'mimetype': 'text/plain', 'lang': 'en'}
container
container_id
contribs[] {'index': 0, 'creator_id': None, 'creator': None, 'raw_name': 'James Constantine Hondros', 'given_name': 'James Constantine', 'surname': 'Hondros', 'role': 'author', 'raw_affiliation': None, 'extra': None}
{'index': None, 'creator_id': None, 'creator': None, 'raw_name': 'University, My', 'given_name': 'My', 'surname': 'University', 'role': 'author', 'raw_affiliation': None, 'extra': {'type': 'DataManager'}}
{'index': None, 'creator_id': None, 'creator': None, 'raw_name': 'Elizabeth Van Acker', 'given_name': 'Elizabeth Van', 'surname': 'Acker', 'role': 'author', 'raw_affiliation': None, 'extra': {'type': 'RelatedPerson'}}
ext_ids {'doi': '10.25904/1912/2738', 'wikidata_qid': None, 'isbn13': None, 'pmid': None, 'pmcid': None, 'core': None, 'arxiv': None, 'jstor': None, 'ark': None, 'mag': None, 'doaj': None, 'dblp': None, 'oai': None, 'hdl': None}
files[] {'state': 'active', 'ident': '6zbsps233rhrnfpmmgkcbpaa3u', 'revision': 'ac9c29b2-2237-4576-9420-37a3b99cad7b', 'redirect': None, 'extra': None, 'edit_extra': None, 'size': 1038483, 'md5': '9237e81db49edaac45e921905468df13', 'sha1': '03df3cdf7a52b962ef8c584acdd7e2101800420d', 'sha256': '4effb3151b45701c094bbe22f33ca5ee1a58422d3a63fce74ea1aad4c673e816', 'urls': [{'url': 'https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/365545/Hondros_2014_02Thesis.pdf;jsessionid=796DB0B459375C9D0E35857165D64211?sequence=1', 'rel': 'publisher'}, {'url': 'https://web.archive.org/web/20200730005942/https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/365545/Hondros_2014_02Thesis.pdf;jsessionid=796DB0B459375C9D0E35857165D64211?sequence=1', 'rel': 'webarchive'}], 'mimetype': 'application/pdf', 'content_scope': None, 'release_ids': ['x4zefmfaw5cxvnqtdqofaaet2a'], 'releases': None}
filesets []
issue
language en
license_slug
number
original_title
pages
publisher Griffith University
refs []
release_date 2018-01-23
release_stage published
release_type article-journal
release_year 2018
subtitle
title Implementing National Disability Service Standards: What Street Level Bureaucrats Exercise Discretion for in the Provision of Employment Services
version
volume
webcaptures []
withdrawn_date
withdrawn_status
withdrawn_year
work_id dt2ft5k34va5zkd7jpcufarzja
As JSON via API

Extra Metadata (raw JSON)

datacite.license [{'rights': 'The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise.'}]
datacite.resourceType Griffith thesis
datacite.resourceTypeGeneral Text
datacite.subjects [{'subject': 'Public service in public interest'}, {'subject': 'National disability service standards'}, {'subject': 'Employment services'}]
release_month 1