Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: how open is open? release_w57ueehcmvegrdf22i563powtq

by Stylianos Serghiou, Despina Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Kevin Boyack, Nico Riedel, Joshua D Wallach, John Ioannidis

Released as a post by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.



Recent concerns about the reproducibility of science have led to several calls for more open and transparent research practices and for the monitoring of potential improvements over time. However, with tens of thousands of new biomedical articles published per week, manually mapping and monitoring changes in transparency is unrealistic. We present an open-source, automated approach to identify five indicators of transparency (data sharing, code sharing, conflicts of interest disclosures, funding disclosures and protocol registration) and apply it across the entire open access biomedical literature of 2.75 million articles on PubMed Central. Our results indicate remarkable improvements in some (e.g. conflict of interest disclosures, funding disclosures), but not other (e.g. protocol registration, code sharing) areas of transparency over time, and map transparency across fields of science, countries, journals and publishers. This work has enabled the creation of a large, integrated, and openly available database to expedite further efforts to monitor, understand and promote transparency and reproducibility in science.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  2.2 MB
file_i3j76a4kf5bmnakktul25hhwrm (repository) (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  post
Stage   unknown
Date   2020-10-30
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 59eb92f5-1d6a-4aa5-a7ea-c896b0124610