Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: how open is open? release_w57ueehcmvegrdf22i563powtq

by Stylianos Serghiou, Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Kevin W Boyack, Nico Riedel, Joshua David Wallach, John P. A. Ioannidis


Recent concerns about the reproducibility of science have led to several calls for more open and transparent research practices and for the monitoring of potential improvements over time. However, with tens of thousands of new biomedical articles published per week, manually mapping and monitoring changes in transparency is unrealistic. We present an open-source, automated approach to identify five indicators of transparency (data sharing, code sharing, conflicts of interest disclosures, funding disclosures and protocol registration) and apply it across the entire open access biomedical literature of 2.75 million articles on PubMed Central. Our results indicate remarkable improvements in some (e.g. conflict of interest disclosures, funding disclosures), but not other (e.g. protocol registration, code sharing) areas of transparency over time, and map transparency across fields of science, countries, journals and publishers. This work has enabled the creation of a large, integrated, and openly available database to expedite further efforts to monitor, understand and promote transparency and reproducibility in science.
In application/xml+jats format

Released as a post by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Release Date 2020-10-30
Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Known Files and URLs

There are no accessible files associated with this release. You could check other releases for this work for an accessible version.

No Full Text Available "Save Paper Now"
Know of a fulltext copy of on the public web? Submit a URL and we will archive it
Type  post
Stage   unknown
Date   2020-10-30
Work Entity
grouping other versions (eg, pre-print) and variants of this release
Cite This Release
Fatcat Bits

State is "active". Revision:
As JSON object via API