Not all interactions are positive: testing how antagonistic interactions impact the robustness of plant-pollinator networks.
release_vq6gh2prebhn5o6s5kicdvwvny
by
Heather Briggs, Carolyn Ayers, Paul R. Armsworth, Berry Brosi
2019
Abstract
Given ongoing pollinator declines, it is important to understand the dynamics of linked extinctions of plants driven by pollinator extinctions. Topological robustness models focused on this question suggest relatively high robustness of plant species to pollinator species extinctions. Still, existing robustness models typically assume that all interactions in plant-pollinator networks are positive, which is clearly not always the case. For example, many pollinators remove floral resources with-out transferring pollen, or even damage floral structures in the case of nectar robbing. Here we in-troduce antagonistic interactions into plant-pollinator networks and assess the resilience of plant communities to pollinator species losses. Incorporating antagonistic interactions leads to lower network robustness, i.e. an increased rate of plant species loss (as compared to networks with only mutualistic interactions) in empirical plant-pollinator networks. In conjunction with extinction order, the addition of increasingly antagonistic interactions was idiosyncratic in that it did not always magnify the effects of extinction order across the three networks. These results underscore the im-portance of considering the full spectrum of interaction outcomes when assessing robustness to coextinctions in plant-pollinator networks, as well as other ecological systems.
In application/xml+jats
format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf 275.2 kB
file_46hz5t5btzfcvgwwnd2qge7t44
|
web.archive.org (webarchive) www.biorxiv.org (web) |
post
Stage
unknown
Date 2019-02-05
10.1101/538702
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar