Looking into Pandora's Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage release uemlmxolerenlnx5x66rmtmygi

by Bastian Greshake

Published in F1000Research by F1000 Research, Ltd.
ISSN-L 2046-1402
Page(s) 541
Release Date 2017-04-21
Publisher F1000 Research, Ltd.
Primary Language en (lookup)
All Contributors (1)

Extra Metadata (raw JSON)

crossref.type journal-article

Known Files and URLs

web.archive.org (webarchive)
pdfs.semanticscholar.org (aggregator)
application/pdf  995.5 kB
web.archive.org (webarchive)
f1000researchdata.s3.amazonaws.com (web)
application/pdf  1.0 MB
www.biorxiv.org (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
application/pdf  1.0 MB
www.biorxiv.org (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
application/pdf  852.8 kB
f1000researchdata.s3.amazonaws.com (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)


This release citing other releases
  1. Pirates in the library – an inquiry into the guerilla open access movement 2016
  2. The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLoS One..2015e0127502 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127502)
  3. A brief history of open access 2016
  4. The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 3; referees: 3 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Res..2016632 (DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8460.3)
  5. The need for citizen science in the transition to a sustainable peer-to-peer-society. Futures..2017 (DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.11.010)
  6. Gates Foundation announces open-access publishing venture. Nature..2017599 (DOI: 10.1038/nature.2017.21700)
  7. A study of institutional spending on open access publication fees in Germany. Peer J..2016e2323 (DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2323)
  8. Trust gives warm welcome to open access. Nature..2004134 (DOI: 10.1038/432134a)
  9. The number of scholarly documents on the public web. PLoS One..2014e93949 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093949)
  10. Bibliogifts in libgen? a study of a text-sharing platform driven by biblioleaks and crowdsourcing. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol..2015874-884 (DOI: 10.1002/asi.23445)
  11. Gold, green, and black open access. Learned Publishing..2017173-175 (DOI: 10.1002/leap.1096)
  12. Shadow libraries and you: Sci-hub usage and the future of ill 2017
  13. Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone. Science..2016508-12 (DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf5664)
  14. Elsevier inc. et al. v. sci-hub et al. case no. 1:15-cv-04282 2015
  15. Meet the robin hood of science 2016
  16. Data from: Who's downloading pirated papers? everyone 2016 (DOI: 10.5061/dryad.q447c)
  17. Correlating the sci-hub data with world bank indicators and identifying academic use. The Winnower..2016 (DOI: 10.15200/winn.146485.57797)
  18. List of dois of papers collected by scihub. figshare..2017 (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4765477.v1)
  19. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological)..1995289-300
  20. De cometarum materia, qui in solis vicinia non exarserunt 53-57 (DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4933-0406-6.50011-5)
  21. Fast and furious (at publishers): The motivations behind crowdsourced research sharing. Coll Res Libr..2017131-149 (DOI: 10.5860/crl.78.2.131)
  22. Correction: The Post-Embargo Open Access Citation Advantage: It Exists (Probably), It's Modest (Usually), and the Rich Get Richer (of Course). PLoS One..2016e0165166 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165166)
  23. Comparing oup to other publishers 2017
  24. Hybrid open access is unreliable 2017
  25. 2013 survey of doctorate recipients 2014
  26. Data and Scripts for Looking into Pandora's Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage. Zenodo..2017 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.472493)
Download Full Text
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2017-04-21
Container Metadata
Open Access Publication
ISSN-L:  2046-1402
Fatcat Entry
Work Entity
grouping other versions (eg, pre-print) and variants of this release
Fatcat Bits

State is "active". Revision:
As JSON object via API