BibTeX
CSL-JSON
MLA
Harvard
COMMON MISTAKE IN CONTRACT: RARE SUCCESS AND COMMON MISAPPREHENSIONS
release_tgcv5hiksbee3lh5zuonrt6nhy
by
Jonathan Morgan
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
Disputes involving shared mistakes should be resolved by considering the meaning (explicit and implicit) of the parties' agreement. There is no room for a free-standing doctrine of mistake. The argument is illustrated by considering three recent decisions on common mistake.
In application/xml+jats format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf 103.2 kB
file_3xasp4ararbozji5wsn5rulcg4
|
web.archive.org (webarchive) www.cambridge.org (web) |
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Cite This
Lookup Links
oaDOI/unpaywall (OA fulltext)
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
SHERPA/RoMEO (journal policies)
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
SHERPA/RoMEO (journal policies)
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar