A few questions about nonresponse in the Netherlands release_t2fsvzjpgzcilhshxdklprcugy

by Ineke Stoop

References

NOTE: currently batch computed and may include additional references sources, or be missing recent changes, compared to entity reference list.
Fuzzy reference matching is a work in progress!
Read more about quality, completeness, and caveats in the fatcat guide.
Showing 1 - 5 of 5 references (in 79ms)
[b0]

via fuzzy
Non-response in the American Time Use Survey: Who Is Missing from the Data and How Much Does It Matter? [report]
Katharine Abraham, Aaron Maitland, Suzanne Bianchi
2006    unpublished
doi:10.3386/t0328 
web.archive.org [PDF]
[b1]

via grobid
De Heer, W. 1999. "International Response Trends, Results of an International Survey." Journal of Official Statistics 15 (2): 129-42.
[b2]

via grobid
De Leeuw, E., and W. de Heer. 2002. "Trends in Household Survey Nonresponse: A Longitudinal and International Comparison." In Survey Nonresponse, edited by M.G. Robert, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and Roderick J.A. Little, 41-54. New York: Wiley.
[b3]

via grobid
Responsive design for household surveys: tools for actively controlling survey errors and costs
Robert M. Groves, Steven G. Heeringa
2006   Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)
doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2006.00423.x 
web.archive.org [PDF]
[b4]

via fuzzy
Nonresponse in the Dutch Time Use Survey: Strategies for Response Enhancement and Bias Reduction
Erik Van Ingen, Ineke Stoop, Koen Breedveld
2008   Field Methods
doi:10.1177/1525822x08323099