Who is to blame for COVID-19? Examining politicized fear and health behavior through a mixed methods study in the United States release_sk3uzeoilzbqrcwepapmrnzela

by Lisa J. Hardy, Adi Mana, Leah Mundell, Moran Neuman, Sharón Benheim, Eric Otenyo

Published in PLoS ONE by Public Library of Science (PLoS).

2021   Volume 16, Issue 9, e0256136

Abstract

<jats:sec id="sec001"> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> Political ideologies drove public actions and health behaviors in the first year of the global pandemic. Different ideas about contagion, health behaviors, and the actions of governing bodies impacted the spread of the virus and health and life. Researchers used an immediate, mixed methods design to explore sociocultural responses to the virus and identified differences and similarities in anxiety, fear, blame, and perceptions of nation across political divides. </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="sec002"> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> Researchers conducted 60 in-depth, semi-structured interviews and administered over 1,000 questionnaires with people living in the United States. The team analyzed data through an exploratory and confirmatory sequential mixed methods design. </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="sec003"> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> In the first months of the pandemic interviewees cited economic inequality, untrustworthy corporations and other entities, and the federal government as threats to life and pandemic control. Participants invoked ideas about others to determine blame. Findings reveal heavy associations between lack of safety during a public health crisis and blame of "culture" and government power across the political spectrum. </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="sec004"> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> Data indicate anxiety across political differences related to ideas of contagion and the maleficence of a powerful elite. Findings on how people understand the nation, politics, and pandemic management contribute to understanding dimensions of health behaviors and underlying connections between anxiety and the uptake of conspiracy theories in public health. The article ends with recommendations drawn from project findings for future pandemic response. </jats:sec>
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  851.6 kB
file_vr2oesmulzaerckjdgwrk4zixi
storage.googleapis.com (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2021-09-01
Language   en ?
Container Metadata
Open Access Publication
In DOAJ
Not in Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  1932-6203
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 11f97a47-b598-497c-9fff-fe4bdaaee746
API URL: JSON