BibTeX
CSL-JSON
MLA
Harvard
Efficiency of using electric toothbrush as an alternative to a tuning fork for artificial buzz pollination is independent of instrument buzzing frequency
release_rtlxoetjirg7hefp24d5jiwl5a
by
Mandeep Tayal, Jesus Chavana, rupesh kariyat
Abstract
Breeding programs and research activities where artificial buzz-pollinations are required to have primarily relied upon using tuning forks, and bumble bees. However, these methods can be expensive, unreliable, and inefficient. To find an alternative, we tested the efficiency of pollen collection using electric toothbrushes and compared it with tuning forks at three vibration frequencies-low, medium, and high and two extraction times at 3 s and 16 s- from two buzz-pollinated species (Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum elaeagnifolium).
In text/plain
format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf 1.2 MB
file_i4oa6s5oqnfbxgbsp3n7q7756i
|
bmcecol.biomedcentral.com (web) web.archive.org (webarchive) |
application/pdf 1.3 MB
file_hyh6ccdn6jevfhnxv5yp4obuzi
|
scholarworks.utrgv.edu (web) web.archive.org (webarchive) |
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Container Metadata
Open Access Publication
In DOAJ
In ISSN ROAD
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:
Open Access Publication
In DOAJ
In ISSN ROAD
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:
1472-6785
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Cite This
Lookup Links
oaDOI/unpaywall (OA fulltext)
Datacite Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
SHERPA/RoMEO (journal policies)
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar
Datacite Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
SHERPA/RoMEO (journal policies)
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar