COMPARISON OF TWO TECHNIQUES OF INTERLOCKING INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING IN FRACTURES OF TIBIA release_rev_f202d804-6b42-4b8d-a897-b98aad6dd9cb

by Dr Hira Khalid, Dr Mavra Hafeez, Dr Aneela Akram

Entity Metadata (schema)

abstracts [{'sha1': '3af5f656cbeb2acaac1d91c75756a1b6bb34b725', 'content': '<strong><em>Aim:</em></strong><em> To compare the results of reamed and unreamed interlocking intramedullary nailing in fractures of tibia in terms of their advantages and disadvantages, fracture stabilization, maintenance of alignment, complications and functional outcome.</em> <strong><em>Design:</em></strong><em> A Prospective comparative study</em> <strong><em>Place and Duration:</em></strong><em> The study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at Mayo Hospital Lahore for one-year duration from April 2019 to April 2020.</em> <strong><em>Patients and Methods:</em></strong><em> A total of 40 patients having closed or grade1 open fractures of tibia that presented within 12 hours of injury were admitted through emergency department. The detailed history was taken. The patients were evaluated both clinically and radiologically. Complete physical and systemic examination was performed to rule out associated injuries. The laboratory investigations were carried out and surgery was planned. Long leg splint was applied. By random selection Unreamed interlocking intramedullary nailing was performed in one group of 20 patients and in the 2nd group intramedullary interlocking nailing was done after reaming of the medullary cavity. Patients were informed about the nature, cost, advantages and limitations of the procedure.</em> <strong><em>Results:</em></strong><em> The patients treated by the unreamed method of interlocking intramedullary nailing had better results regarding the rehabilitation, functional outcome, as scored by the evaluation criteria and radiological union time in comparison with the reamed method of interlocking intramedullary nailing which in relation to patients rehabilitation, functional outcome residual deformities, and post-operative complications, scored less. There were no cases of nonunion resulting from either technique. Two patients developed superficial wound infection, both treated by the reamed method of intramedullary nailing but none developed chronic osteomyelitis</em> <str [...]', 'mimetype': 'text/plain', 'lang': 'en'}]
container
container_id
contribs [{'index': 0, 'creator_id': None, 'creator': None, 'raw_name': 'Dr Hira Khalid, Dr Mavra Hafeez, Dr Aneela Akram', 'given_name': None, 'surname': None, 'role': 'author', 'raw_affiliation': None, 'extra': None}]
edit_extra
ext_ids {'doi': '10.5281/zenodo.3983449', 'wikidata_qid': None, 'isbn13': None, 'pmid': None, 'pmcid': None, 'core': None, 'arxiv': None, 'jstor': None, 'ark': None, 'mag': None, 'doaj': None, 'dblp': None, 'oai': None}
files
filesets
ident
issue
language
license_slug CC-BY
number
original_title
pages
publisher Zenodo
redirect
refs []
release_date 2020-08-13
release_stage published
release_type article-journal
release_year 2020
revision f202d804-6b42-4b8d-a897-b98aad6dd9cb
state
subtitle
title COMPARISON OF TWO TECHNIQUES OF INTERLOCKING INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING IN FRACTURES OF TIBIA
version
volume
webcaptures
withdrawn_date
withdrawn_status
withdrawn_year
work_id awxjnyhn6vb4tlwdwbgm6mfybm
As JSON via API

Extra Metadata (raw JSON)

datacite.license [{'rights': 'Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International', 'rightsIdentifier': 'cc-by-4.0', 'rightsIdentifierScheme': 'SPDX', 'rightsUri': 'https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode', 'schemeUri': 'https://spdx.org/licenses/'}, {'rights': 'Open Access', 'rightsUri': 'info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess'}]
datacite.relations [{'relatedIdentifier': '10.5281/zenodo.3983450', 'relatedIdentifierType': 'DOI', 'relationType': 'HasVersion'}]
datacite.resourceType Journal article
datacite.resourceTypeGeneral Text
release_month 8