Nonlinear, near photo-realistic caricatures using a parametric facial appearance model release_qnxy4lcoqjerhm7ozmlthhjcym

by Stuart J. Gibson, Christopher J. Solomon, Alvaro Pallares-Bejarano

References

This release citing other releases
  1. European Journal of Psychology.1991.Benson, P. J., &Perrett, D. I. (1991). Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images.European Journal of Psychology,3, 105–135.
  2. Perception.1993.Benson, P. J., &Perrett, D. I. (1993). Extracting prototypical facial images from exemplars.Perception,22, 257–262. (DOI: 10.1068/p220257)
  3. Leonardo.1985.Brennan, S. E. (1985). The caricature generator.Leonardo,18, 170–178. (DOI: 10.2307/1578048)
  4. Face Recognition: From theory to applications.1998.Bruce, V., Hancock, P., &Burton, A. M. (1998). Human face perception and identification. In H. Wechsler, P. J. Phillips, V. Bruce, F. F. Soulie, & T. S. Huang (Eds.),Face Recognition: From theory to applications (pp. 51–73). New York: Springer-Verlag. (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-72201-1_3)
  5. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B.1995.Burt, D. M., &Perrett, D. I. (1995). Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces: Computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,335, 137–143. (DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0021)
  6. Visual Cognition.1994.Burton, A.M. (1994). Learning new faces in an interactive activation and competition model.Visual Cognition,1, 313–348. (DOI: 10.1080/13506289408402304)
  7. Cognitive Science.1999.Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., &Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition.Cognitive Science,23, 1–31. (DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2301_1)
  8. Vision Research.1998.Byatt, G., &Rhodes, G. (1998). Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: Implications for models of face recognition.Vision Research,38, 2455–2468. (DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00469-0)
  9. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision.1998.Cootes, T. F., Edwards, G. J., &Taylor, C. J. (1998). Active appearance models. In H. Burkhardt & B. Neumann (Eds.),Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (Vol. 2, pp. 484–498). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  10. British Journal of Psychology.1997.Ellis, A. W., Burton, A. M., Young, A. M., &Flude, B. M. (1997). Repetition priming between parts and wholes: Tests of a computational model of familiar face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,88, 579–608. (DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02659.x)
  11. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2003.2003.Gibson, S. J., Pallares, A., &Solomon, C. J. (2003). Synthesis of photographic quality facial composites using evolutionary algorithms. In R. Harvey & J. A. Banham (Eds.),Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2003 (Vol. 1, pp. 221–230). Norwich, U.K.: Page Bros.
  12. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B.1991.Goodall, C. (1991). Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B,53, 285–339.
  13. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers.2000.Hancock, P. J. B. (2000). Evolving faces from principal components.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32, 327–333. (DOI: 10.3758/bf03207802)
  14. Memory & Cognition.1996.Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V., &Burton, A. M. (1996). Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis.Memory & Cognition,24, 26–40. (DOI: 10.3758/bf03197270)
  15. Principal component analysis.1986.Jolliffe, I. T. (1986).Principal component analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. (DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-1904-8)
  16. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.2002.Lanitis, A., Taylor, C. J., &Cootes, T. F. (2002). Toward automatic simulation of ageing effects on face images.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,24, 442–455. (DOI: 10.1109/34.993553)
  17. Perception.1997.Lee, K. J., &Perrett, D. I. (1997). Presentation time measures of the effects of manipulation in colour space on discrimination of famous faces.Perception,26, 733–752. (DOI: 10.1068/p260733)
  18. Perception.2000.Lee, K. J., &Perrett, D. I. (2000). Manipulation of colour and shape information and its consequence upon recognition and best-likeness judgments.Perception,29, 1291–1312. (DOI: 10.1068/p2792)
  19. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.1997.Moghaddam, B., &Pentland, A. (1997). Probabilistic visual learning for object representation.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,19, 696–710. (DOI: 10.1109/34.598227)
  20. Memory & Cognition.1994.O'Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D., &Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect.Memory & Cognition,22, 208–224. (DOI: 10.3758/bf03208892)
  21. Nature.1994.Perrett, D. I., May, K. A., &Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shapes and judgments of female attractiveness.Nature,368, 239–242. (DOI: 10.1038/368239a0)
  22. Cognitive Psychology.1987.Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., &Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces.Cognitive Psychology,19, 473–497. (DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90016-8)
  23. Acta Psychologica.1999.Scheuchenpflug, R. (1999). Predicting face similarity judgements with a computational model of face space.Acta Psychologica,100, 229–242. (DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(98)00019-5)
  24. Journal of the Optical Society of America A.1987.Sirovich, L., &Kirby, M. (1987). Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,4, 519–524. (DOI: 10.1364/josaa.4.000519)
  25. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.1991.Turk, M., &Pentland, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,3, 71–86. (DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71)
  26. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.1991.Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 161–204. (DOI: 10.1080/14640749108400966)
  27. Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges.2000.Valentine, T. (2000). Face-space models of face recognition. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.),Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 83–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.