Are There Cross‐Cultural Legal Principles? Modal Reasoning Uncovers Procedural Constraints on Law release_ly55qd6q7nhrdn2kf3dgzehmxy

by Ivar R. Hannikainen, Kevin P. Tobia, Guilherme da F. C. F. Almeida, Raff Donelson, Vilius Dranseika, Markus Kneer, Niek Strohmaier, Piotr Bystranowski, Kristina Dolinina, Bartosz Janik, Sothie Keo, Eglė Lauraitytė (+4 others)

Published in Cognitive Science by Wiley.

2021   Volume 45, Issue 8, e13024

Abstract

Despite pervasive variation in the content of laws, legal theorists and anthropologists have argued that laws share certain abstract features and even speculated that law may be a human universal. In the present report, we evaluate this thesis through an experiment administered in 11 different countries. Are there cross-cultural principles of law? In a between-subjects design, participants (N = 3,054) were asked whether there could be laws that violate certain procedural principles (e.g., laws applied retrospectively or unintelligible laws), and also whether there are any such laws. Confirming our preregistered prediction, people reported that such laws cannot exist, but also (paradoxically) that there are such laws. These results document cross-culturally and -linguistically robust beliefs about the concept of law which defy people's grasp of how legal systems function in practice.
In text/plain format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  821.7 kB
file_mjmvvudiczenlcsk2v3ksevkcy
onlinelibrary.wiley.com (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
application/pdf  812.4 kB
file_4ks4b7uerbddjfte7vjnihq3vy
ruj.uj.edu.pl (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Year   2021
Language   en ?
DOI  10.1111/cogs.13024
PubMed  34379347
Container Metadata
Open Access Publication
Not in DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  0364-0213
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 054165ec-a5eb-4207-b9b1-13e36588055b
API URL: JSON