The Text in this Class: Stanley Fish and the Leibnizian Mind release_lqglljxvwvahjem6tp7x67oiw4

by Jonathan Dickstein

Published by Figshare.

2017  

Abstract

Interpretation seems to be the technique by which human beings evaluate a given object. The interpretation of a literary object, then, would seem to entail a given understanding of this object. Put differently, the interpretation of a text would seem to entail a pre-interpretative understanding of this text: its description. However, such reasoning, which certain literary critics—namely, the formalists—presuppose, faces a serious refutation. In what follows, I formulate this refutation with the help of Stanley Fish's Is There a Text in This Class? (1980) and relate it to a trajectory of early-modern philosophical thought, evident in the works of René Descartes and Gottfried Leibniz. This enables me to specify the shortcomings of the formalists' reasoning, to complicate Fish's refutation of it, and to attempt to provide a preliminary ground for a consistent method by which to interpret texts.
In text/plain format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  210.1 kB
file_wq4by4gxofa7rdn73ewovh2xre
au-east.erc.monash.edu.au (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2017-05-21
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: f1f109e7-8597-4848-9625-92920fbdc1f7
API URL: JSON