Passive and Driven Trends in the Evolution of Complexity release_jszxvaillfhw5p34dyxgqchpey

by Larry Yaeger, Virgil Griffith, Olaf Sporns

Released as a article .

(2011)

Abstract

The nature and source of evolutionary trends in complexity is difficult to assess from the fossil record, and the driven vs. passive nature of such trends has been debated for decades. There are also questions about how effectively artificial life software can evolve increasing levels of complexity. We extend our previous work demonstrating an evolutionary increase in an information theoretic measure of neural complexity in an artificial life system (Polyworld), and introduce a new technique for distinguishing driven from passive trends in complexity. Our experiments show that evolution can and does select for complexity increases in a driven fashion, in some circumstances, but under other conditions it can also select for complexity stability. It is suggested that the evolution of complexity is entirely driven---just not in a single direction---at the scale of species. This leaves open the question of evolutionary trends at larger scales.
In text/plain format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  414.5 kB
file_qcd3dfianvcfjiovwoo72l7ita
archive.org (archive)
Read Archived PDF
Archived
Type  article
Stage   submitted
Date   2011-12-21
Version   v1
Language   en ?
arXiv  1112.4906v1
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: f2328dee-7f13-49a6-b575-0dfdc362e68f
API URL: JSON