Validity of reported post-acute health outcomes in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review release_iqcitfqctreufosypo3p2ngbpe

by Julian Hirt, Perrine Janiaud, Viktoria Gloy, Stefan Schandelmaier, Tiago Pereira, Despina Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Steven Goodman, John Ioannidis, Klaus Munkholm, Lars G. Hemkens

Released as a post by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.



Importance: There is concern that post-acute SARS-CoV-2 infection health outcomes ("post-COVID syndrome") in children could be a serious problem but at the same time there is concern about the validity of reported associations between infection and long-term outcomes. Objective: To systematically assess the validity of reported post-acute SARS-CoV-2 infection health outcomes in children. Evidence Review: A search on PubMed and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies published up to January 22, 2022, that reported on post-acute SARS-CoV-2 infection health outcomes in children (<18 years) with a minimum follow-up of 2 months since detection of infection or 1 month since recovery from acute illness. We assessed the consideration of confounding bias and causality, and the risk of bias. Findings: 21 studies including 81,896 children reported up to 97 symptoms with follow-up periods of 2-11.5 months. Fifteen studies had no control group. The reported proportion of children with post-COVID syndrome was between 0% and 66.5% in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=16,986) and 2% to 53.3% in children without SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=64,910). Only 2 studies made a clear causal interpretation of an association of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the main outcome of "post-COVID syndrome" and provided recommendations regarding prevention measures. Two studies mentioned potential limitations in the conclusion of the main text but none of the 21 studies mentioned any limitations in the abstract nor made a clear statement for cautious interpretation. The validity of all 21 studies was seriously limited due to an overall critical risk of bias (critical risk for confounding bias [n=21]; serious or critical risk for selection bias [n=19]; serious risk for misclassification bias [n=3], for bias due to missing data [n=14] and for outcome measurement [n=12]; and critical risk for selective reporting bias [n=16]). Conclusions and Relevance: The validity of reported post-acute SARS-CoV-2 infection health outcomes in children is critically limited. None of the studies provided evidence with reasonable certainty on whether SARS-CoV-2 infection has an impact on post-acute health outcomes, let alone to what extent. Children and their families urgently need much more reliable and methodologically robust evidence to address their concerns and improve care.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  542.8 kB
file_t76hpcpz75fjjguy7hm5svqkzu (repository) (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  post
Stage   unknown
Date   2022-03-20
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: a651f642-95fd-4488-a5f9-5c6e13287a77