Post-acquisition Processing Confounds in Brain Volumetric Quantification of White Matter Hyperintensities release_gmae77mo2bgbzltnft2qipuvhy

by Ahmed A. Bahrani, Omar M. Al-Janabi, Erin L. Abner, Shoshana H. Bardach, Richard J. Kryscio, Donna Wilcock, Charles D. Smith, Gregory A. Jicha

Published in Journal of Neuroscience Methods by Elsevier BV.

2019   Volume 327, p108391

Abstract

Disparate research sites using identical or near-identical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition techniques often produce results that demonstrate significant variability regarding volumetric quantification of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) in the aging population. The sources of such variability have not previously been fully explored. 3D FLAIR sequences from a group of randomly selected aged subjects were analyzed to identify sources-of-variability in post-acquisition processing that can be problematic when comparing WMH volumetric data across disparate sites. The methods developed focused on standardizing post-acquisition protocol processing methods to develop a protocol with less than 0.5% inter-rater variance. A series of experiments using standard MRI acquisition sequences explored post-acquisition sources-of-variability in the quantification of WMH volumetric data. Sources-of-variability included: the choice of image center, software suite and version, thresholding selection, and manual editing procedures (when used). Controlling for the identified sources-of-variability led to a protocol with less than 0.5% variability between independent raters in post-acquisition WMH volumetric quantification. Post-acquisition processing techniques can introduce an average variance approaching 15% in WMH volume quantification despite identical scan acquisitions. Understanding and controlling for such sources-of-variability can reduce post-acquisition quantitative image processing variance to less than 0.5%. Considerations of potential sources-of-variability in MRI volume quantification techniques and reduction in such variability is imperative to allow for reliable cross-site and cross-study comparisons.
In text/plain format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  790.0 kB
file_j7t5vrsc5bd6niq4tj3qk4elpm
uknowledge.uky.edu (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2019-08-10
Language   en ?
Journal Metadata
Not in DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  0165-0270
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 0b7777c4-3aaf-433a-826f-fdb4398c14ba
API URL: JSON