Availability of digital object identifiers in publications archived by PubMed release elfi255hynhnbnvqy56t4r4xbu

by Christophe Boudry, Ghislaine Chartron

Published in Scientometrics by Springer Nature
ISSN-L 0138-9130
Volume 110
Page(s) 1453-1469
Release Date 2017-01-03
Publisher Springer Nature
Primary Language en (lookup)
All Contributors (2)
1
author
2
author

Extra Metadata (raw JSON)

crossref.alternative-id ['2225']
crossref.license [{'delay-in-days': 0, 'content-version': 'unspecified', 'URL': 'http://www.springer.com/tdm', 'start': '2017-01-03T00:00:00Z'}]
crossref.type journal-article

Known Files and URLs

There are no known files associated with this release (you could try other releases for this work?).

References

This release citing other releases
  1. ALM. (2016). Retrieved from http://alm.plos.org/ .
  2. Altmetric. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.altmetric.com/ .
  3. PeerJ.2016.Boudry, C., Denion, E., Mortemousque, B., & Mouriaux, F. (2016). Trends and topics in eye disease research in PubMed from 2010 to 2014. PeerJ, 4, e1557. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1557 . (DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1557)
  4. European Journal of Ophthalmology.2015.Boudry, C., & Mouriaux, F. (2015). Eye neoplasms research: A bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2012. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 25(4), 357–365. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000556 . (DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000556)
  5. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery.2011.Braile, D. M. (2011). After the impact factor, the DOI. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 26(3), 1–2. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20110001 . (DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20110001)
  6. D-Lib Magazine.2015.Brase, J., Lautenschlager, M., & Sens, I. (2015). The tenth anniversary of assigning DOI names to scientific data and a five year history of DataCite. D-Lib Magazine. doi: 10.1045/january2015-brase . (DOI: 10.1045/january2015-brase)
  7. International Journal of Medical Informatics.2007.Carnevale, R., & Aronsky, D. (2007). The life and death of URLs in five biomedical informatics journals. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(4), 269–273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.12.001 . (DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.12.001)
  8. The Electronic Library.2006.Chandrakar, R. (2006). Digital object identifier system: An overview. The Electronic Library, 24(4), 445–452. doi: 10.1108/02640470610689151 . (DOI: 10.1108/02640470610689151)
  9. Crossref Event Data. (2016). Retrieved from http://eventdata.crossref.org/ .
  10. Crossref initiatives will support reporting to funders|Research Information. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.researchinformation.info/news/analysis-opinion/crossref-initiatives-will-support-reporting-funders .
  11. crossref.org. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.crossref.org/ .
  12. crossref.org: :publisher fees. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.crossref.org/02publishers/20pub_fees.html .
  13. CrossRef's DOI Event Tracker Pilot—Crossref Blog. (2015). Retrieved from http://blog.crossref.org/2015/03/crossrefs-doi-event-tracker-pilot.html .
  14. PLoS Biology.2003.DeRisi, S., Kennison, R., & Twyman, N. (2003). The what and whys of DOIs. PLoS Biology, 1(2), e57. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000057 . (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000057)
  15. Digital Object Identifier System Handbook. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.doi.org/hb.html .
  16. DOI display guidelines. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.crossref.org/02publishers/doi_display_guidelines.html .
  17. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.2008.Ducut, E., Liu, F., & Fontelo, P. (2008). An update on uniform resource locator (URL) decay in MEDLINE abstracts and measures for its mitigation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-23 . (DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-23)
  18. The FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.2008.Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22(2), 338–342. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF . (DOI: 10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf)
  19. Scientometrics.2014.Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2014). Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases. Scientometrics, 102(3), 2181–2186. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1503-4 . (DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1503-4)
  20. Serials Review.2013.Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: Rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. doi: 10.1080/00987913.2013.10765486 . (DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2013.10765486)
  21. Learned Publishing.2016.González-Valiente, C. L., Pacheco-Mendoza, J., & Arencibia-Jorge, R. (2016). A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation. Learned Publishing, 29(4), 229–238. doi: 10.1002/leap.1043 . (DOI: 10.1002/leap.1043)
  22. Journal of Informetrics.2016.Gorraiz, J., Melero-Fuentes, D., Gumpenberger, C., & Valderrama-Zurián, J.-C. (2016). Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in web of science and scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 98–109. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.008 . (DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.008)
  23. PLoS ONE.2015.Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0120495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120495 . (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120495)
  24. Scientometrics.2014.Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2014). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145–1163. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3 . (DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3)
  25. Home—NLM Catalog—NCBI. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/ .
  26. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics.2016.Honor, L. B., Haselgrove, C., Frazier, J. A., & Kennedy, D. N. (2016). Data citation in neuroimaging: Proposed best practices for data identification and attribution. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 10, 34. doi: 10.3339/fninf.2016.00034 . (DOI: 10.3339/fninf.2016.00034)
  27. ISO 26324:2012—Information and documentation—Digital object identifier system. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43506 .
  28. Journal of Digital Information Management.2015.Khedmatgozar, H. R., & Alipour-Hafezi, M. (2015). A basic comparative framework for evaluation of digital identifier systems. Journal of Digital Information Management, 13(3), 191.
  29. Journal of Computer Aided Molecular Design.2014.Neumann, J., & Brase, J. (2014). DataCite and DOI names for research data. Journal of Computer Aided Molecular Design, 28(10), 1035–1041. doi: 10.1007/s10822-014-9776-5 . (DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9776-5)
  30. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications.2011.Park, S., Zo, H., Ciganek, A. P., & Lim, G. G. (2011). Examining success factors in the adoption of digital object identifier systems. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(6), 626–636. (DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2011.05.004)
  31. Interlending and Document Supply.1999.Paskin, N. (1999). The digital object identifier system: Digital technology meets content management. Interlending and Document Supply, 27(1), 13–16. doi: 10.1108/02641619910255829 . (DOI: 10.1108/02641619910255829)
  32. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences.2010.Paskin, N. (2010). Digital object identifier (DOI) system. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, 3, 1586–1592.
  33. Plumx. (2015). Retrieved from https://plu.mx/ .
  34. Rasmussen, P. G., & Andersen, J. P. (2013). Altmetrics: An alternate perspective on research evaluation. ScieCom Info, 96(2). Retrieved from http://journals.lub.lu.se/index.php/sciecominfo/article/view/7292 .
  35. RECODE. (2015). Retrieved from June 13, 2016. http://policy.recodeproject.eu/publishers/policy-content/ .
  36. Journal of Electronic Publishing.1997.Rosenblatt, B. (1997). The digital object identifier: Solving the dilemma of copyright protection online. Journal of Electronic Publishing. doi: 10.3998/3336451.0003.204 . (DOI: 10.3998/3336451.0003.204)
  37. RP-16-2013 PIE-J (short URL)—National Information Standards Organization. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/publications/rp/rp-16-2013/ .
  38. Publishing Research Quarterly.2001.Sidman, D., & Davidson, T. (2001). A practical guide to automating the digital supply chain with the digital object identifier (DOI). Publishing Research Quarterly, 17(2), 9–23. doi: 10.1007/s12109-001-0019-y . (DOI: 10.1007/s12109-001-0019-y)
  39. Sieck, S. (2003). Using the DOI to improve profitability in publishers' E-Commerce operations. EPS white paper series.
  40. Publishing Research Quarterly.1999.Simmonds, A. W. (1999). The digital object identifier (DOI). Publishing Research Quarterly, 15(2), 10–13. doi: 10.1007/s12109-999-0022-2 . (DOI: 10.1007/s12109-999-0022-2)
  41. Scientometrics.2013.Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1131–1143. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2 . (DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2)
  42. Swan, A. (2010). The open access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Retrieved from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18516 .
  43. PLoS ONE.2013.Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 . (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841)
  44. Science Editor.2015.Tolwinska, A. (2015). Need to know what's going on with an article DOI? The wait is over. Science Editor, 38(3/4), 106–108.
  45. United Nations Statistics Division-Standard Country and Area Codes Classifications (M49). (2016). Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm .
  46. Journal of Informetrics.2015.Valderrama-Zurián, J.-C., Aguilar-Moya, R., Melero-Fuentes, D., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2015). A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 570–576. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002 . (DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002)
  47. Journal of Informetrics.2015.Vardakas, K. Z., Tsopanakis, G., Poulopoulou, A., & Falagas, M. E. (2015). An analysis of factors contributing to PubMed's growth. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 592–617. (DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.06.001)
  48. Journal of the Medical Library Association.2009.Wagner, C., Gebremichael, M. D., Taylor, M. K., & Soltys, M. J. (2009). Disappearing act: Decay of uniform resource locators in health care management journals. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 97(2), 122–130. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.2.009 . (DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.2.009)
  49. Serials Review.2007.Wang, J. (2007). Digital object identifiers and their use in libraries. Serials Review, 33(3), 161–164. doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2007.05.006 . (DOI: 10.1016/j.serrev.2007.05.006)
  50. Zotero|Home. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.zotero.org/ .
No Full Text Available
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2017-01-03
Container Metadata
Unknown OA Status
Not in DOAJ
Not in ISSN ROAD
ISSN-L:  0138-9130
Fatcat Entry
Work Entity
grouping other versions (eg, pre-print) and variants of this release
Cite This Release
Fatcat Bits

State is "active". Revision:
5bf21226-2d21-4e0d-ae3e-f667320e4424
As JSON object via API