EMA and FDA psychiatric drug trial guidelines: assessment of guideline development and trial design recommendations release_ebse52m3pndehgykva6xef274i

by Kim Boesen, Peter C. Gøtzsche, John Ioannidis

Published in Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences by Cambridge University Press (CUP).

Volume 30e35 (2021)

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec id="S2045796021000147_sec_a1"> <jats:title>Aims</jats:title> The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) produce guidelines for the design of pivotal psychiatric drug trials used in new drug applications. It is unknown who are involved in the guideline development and what specific trial design recommendations they give. </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2045796021000147_sec_a2" sec-type="methods"> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> Cross-sectional study of EMA Clinical Efficacy and Safety Guidelines and FDA Guidance Documents. Study outcomes: (1) guideline committee members and declared conflicts of interest; (2) guideline development and organisation of commenting phases; (3) categorisation of stakeholders who comment on draft and final guidelines according to conflicts of interest ('industry', 'not-industry but with industry-related conflicts', 'independent', 'unclear'); and (4) trial design recommendations (trial duration, psychiatric comorbidity, 'enriched design', efficacy outcomes, comparator choice). Protocol registration <jats:uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.22.20018499">https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.22.20018499</jats:uri> (27 January 2020). </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2045796021000147_sec_a3" sec-type="results"> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> We included 13 EMA and five FDA guidelines covering 15 psychiatric indications. Eleven months after submission, the EMA had not processed our request regarding committee member disclosures. FDA offices draft the Guidance Documents, but the Agency is not in possession of employee conflicts of interest declarations because FDA employees generally may not hold financial interests (although some employees may hold interests up to $15,000). The EMA and FDA guideline development phases are similar; drafts and final versions are publicly announced and everybody can submit comments. Seventy stakeholders commented on ten guidelines: 38 (54%) 'industry', 18 (26%) 'not-industry but with industry-related conflicts', six (9%) 'independent' and eight (11%) 'unclear'. They submitted 1014 comments: 640 (68%) 'industry', 243 (26%) 'not-industry but with industry-related conflicts', 44 (5%) 'independent' and 20 (2%) 'unclear' (67 could not be assigned to a specific stakeholder). The recommended designs were generally for trials of short duration; with restricted trial populations; allowing previous exposure to the drug; and often recommending rating scale efficacy outcomes. EMA mainly recommended three arm designs (both placebo and active comparators), whereas FDA mainly recommended placebo-controlled designs. There were also other important differences and FDA's recommendations regarding the exclusion of psychiatric comorbidity seemed less restrictive. </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2045796021000147_sec_a4" sec-type="conclusions"> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> The EMA and FDA clinical research guidelines for psychiatric pivotal trials recommend designs that tend to have limited generalisability. Independent and non-conflicted stakeholders are underrepresented in the guideline development. It seems warranted with more active involvement of scientists and independent organisations without conflicts of interest in the guideline development process. </jats:sec>
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  289.5 kB
file_vp5senae3rcqzlpo2vvtxjzowy
web.archive.org (webarchive)
www.cambridge.org (publisher)
Read Archived PDF
Archived
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2021-04-30
Language   en ?
Container Metadata
Open Access Publication
In DOAJ
In Keepers Registery
ISSN-L:  2045-7960
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 189933dc-b71b-446e-a139-36e283d3d8b4
API URL: JSON