Experimental practices in economics: a methodological challenge for psychologists? release_d2fme3jkj5hm7acwa6cy3qnv5a

by R Hertwig, A Ortmann

Published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

2001   Volume 24, Issue 3, p383-403; discussion 403-51

Abstract

This target article is concerned with the implications of the surprisingly different experimental practices in economics and in areas of psychology relevant to both economists and psychologists, such as behavioral decision making. We consider four features of experimentation in economics, namely, script enactment, repeated trials, performance-based monetary payments, and the proscription against deception, and compare them to experimental practices in psychology, primarily in the area of behavioral decision making. Whereas economists bring a precisely defined "script" to experiments for participants to enact, psychologists often do not provide such a script, leaving participants to infer what choices the situation affords. By often using repeated experimental trials, economists allow participants to learn about the task and the environment; psychologists typically do not. Economists generally pay participants on the basis of clearly defined performance criteria; psychologists usually pay a flat fee or grant a fixed amount of course credit. Economists virtually never deceive participants; psychologists, especially in some areas of inquiry, often do. We argue that experimental standards in economics are regulatory in that they allow for little variation between the experimental practices of individual researchers. The experimental standards in psychology, by contrast, are comparatively laissez-faire. We believe that the wider range of experimental practices in psychology reflects a lack of procedural regularity that may contribute to the variability of empirical findings in the research fields under consideration. We conclude with a call for more research on the consequences of methodological preferences, such as the use on monetary payments, and propose a "do-it-both-ways" rule regarding the enactment of scripts, repetition of trials, and performance-based monetary payments. We also argue, on pragmatic grounds, that the default practice should be not to deceive participants.
In text/plain format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  501.6 kB
file_3gzl5tmvc5a4td2eu5y7wk62vu
home.cerge-ei.cz (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
application/pdf  518.4 kB
file_yujqu26tzbehflyrinmuvmvgfi
www2.psych.ubc.ca (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
application/pdf  729.2 kB
file_nvwkztlbi5fv3eurnol36wcswi
library.mpib-berlin.mpg.de:80 (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
application/pdf  516.1 kB
file_2xe77jbv5jf7pnz7ea43aiw3ji
econweb.ucsd.edu (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Year   2001
Language   en ?
PubMed  11682798
Container Metadata
Open Access Publication
Not in DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  0140-525X
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: e3815f5e-57a8-4f2b-b7a0-37cd1a7fe7bb
API URL: JSON