Examination of the Factor Structure of a Global Cognitive Function Battery across Race and Time release_cqvblpgimnhxxp7xor3jhq3irq

by Lisa L. Barnes, Futoshi Yumoto, Ana Capuano, Robert S. Wilson, David A. Bennett, Rochelle E. Tractenberg

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>Older African Americans tend to perform more poorly on cognitive function tests than older Whites. One possible explanation for their poorer performance is that the tests used to assess cognition may not reflect the same construct in African Americans and Whites. Therefore, we tested measurement invariance, by race and over time, of a structured 18-test cognitive battery used in three epidemiologic cohort studies of diverse older adults. Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses were carried out with full-information maximum likelihood estimation in all models to capture as much information as was present in the observed data. Four different aspects of the data were fit to each model: comparative fit index (CFI), standardized root mean square residuals (SRMR), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and model<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mime-subtype="gif" mimetype="image" xlink:href="S1355617715001113_eqnU1" xlink:type="simple" /><jats:tex-math>$$\chi ^{2} $$</jats:tex-math></jats:alternatives></jats:inline-formula>. We found that the most constrained model fit the data well (CFI=0.950; SRMR=0.051; RMSEA=0.057 (90% confidence interval: 0.056, 0.059); the model<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" mime-subtype="gif" mimetype="image" xlink:href="S1355617715001113_eqnU2" xlink:type="simple" /><jats:tex-math>$$\chi ^{2} $$</jats:tex-math></jats:alternatives></jats:inline-formula>=4600.68 on 862 df), supporting the characterization of this model of cognitive test scores as invariant over time and racial group. These results support the conclusion that the cognitive test battery used in the three studies is invariant across race and time and can be used to assess cognition among African Americans and Whites in longitudinal studies. Furthermore, the lower performance of African Americans on these tests is not due to bias in the tests themselves but rather likely reflect differences in social and environmental experiences over the life course. (<jats:italic>JINS</jats:italic>, 2016,<jats:italic>22</jats:italic>, 66–75)
In application/xml+jats format

Published in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
ISSN-L 1355-6177
Volume 22
Issue 01
Page(s) 66-75
Release Date 2015-11-13
Container Type journal
Publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Primary Language en (lookup)

Known Files and URLs

application/pdf  443.3 kB
sha1:bafef7b6526e4a6f2bd4...
web.archive.org (webarchive)
europepmc.org (repository)
Read Full Text
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2015-11-13
DOI  10.1017/s1355617715001113
PubMed  26563713
PMC  PMC4763720
Wikidata  Q36607336
Container Metadata
Not in DOAJ
Not in ISSN ROAD
In Keepers Registery
ISSN-L:  1355-6177
Fatcat Entry
Work Entity
grouping other versions (eg, pre-print) and variants of this release
Cite This Release
Fatcat Bits

State is "active". Revision:
9acf52a7-ddb7-435f-a716-401f4b31de0f
As JSON object via API