Why Is Safe Science Good Science? release_brxe7goarbcrveixjewkemknpy

by Camilla Kao, Che-I Kao, Russell Furr

Released as a post by American Chemical Society (ACS).



In science, safety can seem unfashionable. Satisfying safety requirements can slow the pace of research, make it cumbersome, or cost significant amounts of money. The logic of rules can seem unclear. Compliance can feel like a negative incentive. So besides the obvious benefit that safety keeps one safe, why do some scientists preach "safe science is good science"? Understanding the principles that underlie this maxim might help to create a strong positive incentive to incorporate safety into the pursuit of groundbreaking science.<div><br></div><div>This essay explains how safety can enhance the quality of an experiment and promote innovation in one's research. Being safe induces a researcher to have <b>greater control</b> over an experiment, which reduces the <b>uncertainty</b> that characterizes the experiment. Less uncertainty increases both <b>safety</b> and the <b>quality</b> of the experiment, the latter including <b>statistical quality</b> (reproducibility, sensitivity, etc.) and <b>countless other properties</b> (yield, purity, cost, etc.). Like prototyping in design thinking and working under the constraint of creative limitation in the arts, <b>considering safety issues</b> is a hands-on activity that involves <b>decision-making</b>. Making decisions leads to new ideas, which spawns <b>innovation</b>.</div>
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  529.0 kB
chemrxiv.org (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  post
Stage   unknown
Date   2018-02-13
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 43ec74f7-9600-4ce9-b5d1-5a24ff05f102