BibTeX
CSL-JSON
MLA
Harvard
Evaluating Content Selection in Summarization: The Pyramid Method
release_bfy66trlvnclhibre6tn2vwtj4
by
Ani Nenkova, Rebecca Passonneau
Published
by Columbia University.
2017
Abstract
We present an empirically grounded method for evaluating content selection in summarization. It incorporates the idea that no single best model summary for a collection of documents exists. Our method quantifies the relative importance of facts to be conveyed. We argue that it is reliable, predictive and diagnostic, thus improves considerably over the shortcomings of the human evaluation method currently used in the Document Understanding Conference.
In text/plain
format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf 128.5 kB
file_eiypt5ydqzgzlle6oor72hwnym
|
academiccommons.columbia.edu (web) web.archive.org (webarchive) |
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type
Stage
Date 2017-06-19
article-journal
Stage
published
Date 2017-06-19
DOI
10.7916/d80r9xvd
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Cite This
Lookup Links
oaDOI/unpaywall (OA fulltext)
Datacite Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar
Datacite Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar