Biomechanical comparison of two locking plate constructs under cyclic torsional loading in a fracture gap model
Two screws versus three screws per fragment release_b2wweo3b6rfpbovvr6or7ytvzi

by A. Bilmont, S. Palierne, M. Verset, P. Swider, A. Autefage

Published in Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology by Schattauer GmbH.

2015   Volume 28, Issue 05, p323-330

Abstract

<jats:title>Summary</jats:title> Objectives: The number of locking screws required per fragment during bridging osteo-synthesis in the dog has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to assess the survival of two constructs, with either two or three screws per fragment, under cyclic torsion. Methods: Ten-hole 3.5 mm stainless steel locking compression plates (LCP) were fixed 1 mm away from bone surrogates with a fracture gap of 47 mm using two bicortical locking screws (10 constructs) or three bicortical locking screws (10 constructs) per fragment, placed at the extremities of each LCP. Constructs were tested in cyclic torsion (range: 0 to +0.218 rad) until failure. Results: The 3-screws constructs (29.65 ± 1.89 N.m/rad) were stiffer than the 2-screws constructs (23.73 ± 0.87 N.m/rad), and therefore, were subjected to a greater torque during cycling (6.05 ± 1.33 N.m and 4.88 ± 1.14 N.m respectively). The 3-screws constructs sustained a significantly greater number of cycles (20,700 ± 5,735 cycles) than the 2-screws constructs (15,600 ± 5,272 cycles). In most constructs, failure was due to screw damage at the junction of the shaft and head. The remaining constructs failed because of screw head unlocking, sometimes due to incomplete seating of the screw head prior to testing. Clinical significance: Omitting the third innermost locking screw during bridging osteosynthesis led to a reduction in fatigue life of 25% and construct stiffness by 20%. Fracture of the screws is believed to occur sequentially, starting with the innermost screw that initially shields the other screws.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  887.8 kB
file_4tpxy5k725hhxjhdefgirrxn3y
oatao.univ-toulouse.fr (repository)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
application/pdf  955.6 kB
file_pynnzwalbjgxtfvhfs4sut7uze
hal.archives-ouvertes.fr (repository)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Year   2015
Language   en ?
DOI  10.3415/vcot-14-12-0181
PubMed  26219753
Wikidata  Q51830398
Container Metadata
Not in DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  0932-0814
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 970adf36-5e00-4c4e-a391-4045983c7482
API URL: JSON