Anatomy of green open access release atwt7hhayreipfc4llbyzizzjm

by Bo-Christer Björk, Mikael Laakso, Patrik Welling, Patrik Paetau

ISSN-L 2330-1635
Volume 65
Page(s) 237-250
Release Date 2013-11-06
Publisher Wiley
Primary Language en (lookup)
All Contributors (4)

Extra Metadata (raw JSON)

crossref.type journal-article
subtitle ['Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology']

Known Files and URLs

sha1:67819a776585a711796e... (web) (webarchive)


This release citing other releases
  1. Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences Learned Publishing.200685 (DOI: 10.1087/095315106776387011)
  2. Armbruster , C. 2010 Implementing open access: policy case studies
  3. arXiv 2012 Monthly submission rate statistics
  4. A comparison of subscription and open access journals in construction management and related fields Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building.42 (DOI: 10.5130/ajceb.v12i2.2560)
  5. The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.1496 (DOI: 10.1002/asi.22709)
  6. Open access to the scientific journal literature: Status and challenges for the information systems community Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.201239 (DOI: 10.1002/bult.2012.1720380512)
  7. Scientific journal publishing: Yearly volume and open access availability Information Research.2009391
  8. Open Access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009 PLoS ONE.2010e11273 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011273)
  9. Self-archiving journal articles: A case study of faculty practice and missed opportunity. portal Libraries and the Academy.2009223 (DOI: 10.1353/pla.0.0042)
  10. Authors' awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories New Review of Academic Librarianship.2010145 (DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2010.518851)
  11. CrossRef 2012
  12. Institutional repositories, open access, and scholarly communication: a study of conflicting paradigms The Journal of Academic Librarianship.2011460 (DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002)
  13. Davis , P.M. Connolly , M.J.L. 2007 Institutional repositories: Evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace
  14. The suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model in open access adoption studies Information Development.201132 (DOI: 10.1177/0266666910385375)
  15. Finch , J. 2012
  16. Romeo Studies 3: How academics expect to use open access research papers Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2003171 (DOI: 10.1177/0961000603353005)
  17. Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research PLoS ONE.2010e13636 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013636)
  18. Gargouri , Y. Larivière , V. Gingras , Y. Brody , T. Carr , L. Harnad , S. 2012a
  19. Gargouri , Y. Larivière , V. Gingras , Y. Carr , L. Harnad , S. 2012b
  20. Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin.200539
  21. The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access Serials Review.2004310 (DOI: 10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013)
  22. Open scholarship: Authority, community, and sustainability in the age of Web 2.0. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Publishing (ELPUB2008).2008.
  23. Open access availability of articles by Nordic authors ScieCom Info.2010
  24. Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: Exploring the costs and benefits A report to the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC).2009256
  25. Planting the green seeds for a golden harvest: Comments and clarification on "going for gold D-Lib Magazine.2013 (DOI: 10.1045/january2013-houghton)
  26. JISC infoNet 2012
  27. Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation MIS Quarterly.2005113
  28. Faculty self-archiving: Motivations and barriers Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.20101909 (DOI: 10.1002/asi.21336)
  29. Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication Journal of the American Society for Information Science.20001306 (DOI: 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::aid-asi1047>;2-t)
  30. A bit more to it: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.200347 (DOI: 10.1002/asi.10154)
  31. The current state of open access to research articles from the University of Helsinki ScieCom Info.2010
  32. Laakso , M. 2013 Journal publisher self-archiving policies and the potential for growth in open access
  33. Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure BMC Medicine.2012124 (DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-124)
  34. Laakso , M. Björk , B-C. 2013 Delayed open access: An overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (DOI: 10.1002/asi.22856)
  35. Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age ARL.2003
  36. An overview of open access in the fields of business and management Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship.2011108 (DOI: 10.1080/08963568.2011.554786)
  37. Status of open access in the biomedical field in 2005 Journal of the Medical Library Association.2009 (DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.002)
  38. McVeigh , M. 2004
  39. Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.20111130 (DOI: 10.1002/asi.21532)
  40. The effect of "Open Access" upon citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv's Condensed Matter Section Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.20062047 (DOI: 10.1002/asi.20663)
  41. Coercive power in social exchange.1997. (DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511570919)
  42. Morris , S. 2009
  43. Morrison , H. 2012
  44. Digital repositories ten years on: what do scientific researchers think of them and how do they use them? Learned Publishing.2012195 (DOI: 10.1087/20120306)
  45. NISO 2008
  46. OpCit Project 2012
  47. OpenDOAR 2012
  48. PEER 2011
  49. Poynder , R. 2012
  50. ROAR 2012 ROARMAP: Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies
  51. RCUK 2013 RCUK Policy on Open Access and Supporting Guidance
  52. Scimago 2012
  53. Scopus 2012
  54. SHERPA/RoMEO 2012
  55. Open Access.2012.
  56. Swan , A. 2010
  57. Open access self-archiving: An author study.2005.
  58. UlrichsWeb 2012
  59. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view MIS Quarterly.2003425
  60. Wagner , A.B. 2010 10.5062/F4Q81B0W
  61. WoK 2012
  62. The access principle.2005.
Download Full Text
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2013-11-06
Container Metadata
Unknown OA Status
Not in DOAJ
ISSN-L:  2330-1635
Fatcat Entry
Work Entity
grouping other versions (eg, pre-print) and variants of this release
Fatcat Bits

State is "active". Revision:
As JSON object via API