Surgical Management of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media with Intracranial Complications release_asz574prmzft5htvn72c74zekm

by Gerardo Aniano C. Dimaguila, Nixon S. See, Francisco A. Victoria

Published in Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery by Philippine Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Inc. (PSO-HNS).

2012   Volume 27, p32-34


Intracranial abscess is a serious, life-threatening condition with a dire prognosis. Although the advent of the antibiotic era has drastically reduced the incidence of the disease, predisposing factors such as untreated ear infections, poor personal hygiene, significant trauma with violation of the sterile cranial environment as well as existing co-morbidities such as an immunocompromised state make intracranial abscess a horrifying reality. Ear infections, in particular, are notorious for being the origin of roughly 50% of cerebellar abscesses.1
             Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is one of the leading causes of brain abscess. Shaw and Russell2 reviewed 47 cases of cerebellar abscess and showed that 93% were caused by CSOM; the most common mechanism of entry into the brain parenchyma being direct extension. Chronic infection in the middle ear space could erode through the tegmen tympani and into the temporal lobe or through the tegmen mastoidei into the cerebellum. Neurological symptoms may be delayed as the abscess 'grows' in areas around the cerebellum that are regarded as 'silent', until vital areas such as those responsible for coordination and balance are violated.
             We describe a case of cerebellar abscess secondary to CSOM and discuss the possibility of performing ear surgery with simultaneous drainage of a contiguous abscess through a transmastoid approach in cases of chronic suppurative otitis media with intracranial complications.
 A 21-year-old man consulted with a chief complaint of headache. The history started 13 years prior to consult, when at the age of 8, he developed ear pain with ear discharge. Since then, ear discharge recurred around 4-5 times a year despite various medications prescribed by different physicians. Each time, an ENT specialty consultation was advised but not availed of.
 1 month prior to admission, the patient consulted a physician for recurrent temporal headaches radiating to the periorbital area and described as sometimes crushing, sometimes throbbing, with VAS pain scale 5/10 and associated with nausea. There was also pain in both ears and purulent, foul smelling discharge from the left ear associated with decreased hearing. Unrecalled medications were again prescribed and he was sent home with an ENT specialist referral which he did not comply with.
 Two weeks prior to admission, the headache grew worse, 8-9/10 on the pain scale with persistent nausea and progressive hearing loss on the left ear despite the unrecalled medications.
 One week prior to admission, the intolerable condition prompted an ENT specialist consult and diagnosis of chronic suppurative otitis media, AS and chronic otitis media, AD. Cefuroxime 500mg tab every 8 hours, celecoxib 200mg tab every 12 hours and ofloxacin otic drops every 8 hours were started and hospital admission was advised but initially refused. A temporal bone CT scan showed a large cholesteatoma with destruction of the posterior wall of the left mastoid and probable intracranial extension. (Figure 1) The patient then consented to admission.
 On the day of admission, he now had severe headache, dizziness and occasional vomiting. No neurologic symptoms such as facial asymmetry, lagopthalmos, or paresthesias were reported. A cerebellar abscess was entertained. On the 2nd hospital day, the patient's neurologic status started to deteriorate with moments of agitation and combative behavior interspersed with drowsiness and lucid behavior. His blood pressure also started to increase from 110/80 on admission to 160/110. Magnetic Resosnance Imaging (MRI) revealed a rim-enhancing destructive lesion in the left mastoid and a left cerebellar abscess. (Figure 2)
 On the 3rd hospital day, he showed signs of neurologic deterioration despite aggressive medical management, but we opted to continue temporizing rather than risk worsening the situation by performing mastoidectomy alone without the availability of the neurosurgery service. On the 5th hospital day, emergency burr holes with left lateral occipital craniectomy and aspiration of abscess was performed with radical mastoidectomy and meatoplasty, AS. He was discharged improved on the 9th hospital day (4th post-operative day).
             A common dictum in our institution about the management of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) with extra- or intra- cranial complications is, 'never let the sun set without performing ear surgery on the patient.' Our patient presented at the emergency room with warning signs of an intracranial extension of the ear infection. The frequent headaches and vomiting probably indicated an increase in intracranial pressure.
             The patient's deteriorating neurologic status with moments of agitation and combative behavior interspersed with drowsiness and lucid behavior and increasing blood pressure by the second hospital day were further signs of increased intracranial pressure. A cerebellar abscess was confirmed on MRI.
 Deciding that the risks of herniation and further damage were far greater than potential benefits of performing mastoidectomy alone without aspiration of the cerebellar abscess, we opted to wait until simultaneous left lateral occipital craniectomy and aspiration of abscess could be performed with the mastoidectomy and meatoplasty.
 A review of the literature shows authors advocating neurosurgery first then performing ear surgery after the patient has been stabilized. This has been emphasized time and again by Shaw and Russel.2
 Through the years, the practice has slowly shifted to performing simultaneous neurosurgery and mastoidectomy. Richter et al.3 reported a case of a 39-year-old male diagnosed with otogenic cerebellar abscess surgically managed by performing craniectomy and mastoidectomy together. Other physicians also reported favorable outcomes for concomitant craniectomy and mastoidectomy, including Garayev et al.4 and Kurien et al.5
 Another shift in surgical practice advocates evacuation of the brain abscess via a transtemporal approach. Penido Nde et al.6 reported favorable results for 10 patients in whom the brain abscess was drained through open mastoidectomy out of 33 patients with otogenic brain abscess over 15 years. In 2010, Alaani et al.7 reported a series of seven patients where a transtemporal approach to otogenic brain abscess was employed. In all cases, the abscess and ear pathology were successfully treated using a single-stage transmastoid approach. These experiences all show that mastoidectomy and drainage of brain abscess could be done safely together with little risk.
 In the overall management of patients it is also wise to consider the economic aspects of treating disease. If shorter hospital stays can be attained by alternative methods with the same favorable outcomes as gained by usual practices, it may be time to consider new management approaches. The benefits of waiting for a neurosurgeon versus the risks of evacuating the abscess through a transtemporal approach should be weighed in emergent situations. Based on the current literature, a transtemporal approach to the evacuation of a brain abscess can be performed in the absence of a neurosurgeon but prudence would dictate that a neurosurgical evaluation should be undertaken if readily available.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  181.0 kB
file_qeo7a57qpfc77djxxeuvpmph3u (webarchive) (web)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2012-12-03
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: ab6a5e7c-223c-439e-8781-c3428c4b4d6b