Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite release_ajj74bcg4fet5nmrqorxyotnku

by John Ioannidis, Eran Bendavid, Maia Salholz-Hillel, Kevin W Boyack, Jeroen Baas

Released as a post by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.



Massive scientific productivity accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the citation impact of COVID-19 publications relative to all scientific work published in 2020-2021 and assessed the impact on scientist citation profiles. Using Scopus data until August 1, 2021, COVID-19 items accounted for 4% of papers published, 20% of citations received to papers published in 2020-2021 and >30% of citations received in 36 of the 174 disciplines of science (up to 79.3% in General and Internal Medicine). Across science, 98 of the 100 most-cited papers published in 2020-2021 were related to COVID-19. 110 scientists received >=10,000 citations for COVID-19 work, but none received >=10,000 citations for non-COVID-19 work published in 2020-2021. For many scientists, citations to their COVID-19 work already accounted for more than half of their total career citation count. Overall, these data show a strong covidization of research citations across science with major impact on shaping the citation elite.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf  9.9 MB
file_ruqe3uu5fbervpqibkaiivnpcm (repository) (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  post
Stage   unknown
Date   2022-01-25
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 3110898a-5692-4fe1-a330-85eb3b4ea5d2