Obligations of Conscience
release_a4hegfu2nzaxrdk36ntbokzoee
by
Shane N. Glackin
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
In this paper, I outline and defend a commonly-held moral view which has received surprisingly little sustained philosophical attention. This view, which I call the 'authority of conscience,' states that believing ourselves to have moral obligations to act in a certain way does in fact create an obligation to act in that way. Although I do not provide a positive case for the principle of authoritative conscience, beyond its popularity and intuitive force, I defend it against several <jats:italic>prima facie</jats:italic> objections. I then go on to demonstrate that the principle does not entail any anti-realist metaethical commitments, and is therefore compatible in particular, and contrary to appearances, with plausible formulations of moral realism.
In application/xml+jats
format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf 303.4 kB
file_pyjvjomj7baebh6xaqcetbk7sq
|
brill.com (publisher) web.archive.org (webarchive) |
article-journal
Stage
published
Date 2021-10-21
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
SHERPA/RoMEO (journal policies)
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar