Theorizing Order(s) on the Internet
Theorizing Order(s) on the Internet
release_5az7cg2cufadbltfbx3zjhdimq
by
Matthias C. Kettemann
2020 p182-232
Abstract
Chapter 5 shows the potential of theoretical approaches to solving the normative crisis on the internet. In turn, key theories of order in the broader sense are presented and discussed. Though the majority of these theories were not posited with a view to the internet, the present study draws from their epistemic potential for the regulation of the internet. Theories (and key representatives of that theory) include systems theory (Luhmann/Teubner), constitutionalization/global constitutionalism (Pernice), transnationalism (Viellechner, Calliess), legal pluralism (Seinecke), multinormativity (Forst), network theory (Vesting), interoperability theory (Palfrey, Gasser, Weber), massive online micro justice (De Werra), conflict studies (Mueller), and infrastructuralization (DeNardis). Further, the study assesses the historically sedimented discourses on internet governance and their influence on ordering the internet as well as more recent attempts to "define online norms."
In application/xml+jats
format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf 5.9 MB
file_yaahdefxo5edrgcoltgjdqxkra
|
oxford.universitypressscholarship.com (publisher) web.archive.org (webarchive) |
chapter
Stage
published
Date 2020-07-27
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar